You may have heard Michael Moore's new film "Slacker Uprising" is available for free to everyone in the United States and Canada. It is the first time ever that a major feature-length film is debuting as a free download on the internet -- legally.
Why did Michael Moore decide to do this? There are two reasons:
1. Next year it will be the 20th anniversary since his first film, "Roger & Me," so he wants to thank everyone who has supported his work.
2. Michael is hoping to motivate new voters to make it to the polls on November 4th.
"Slacker Uprising" takes place in the wake of "Fahrenheit 9/11," during the run-up to the 2004 election, as he traveled for 42 days across America, visiting 62 cities in an attempt to remove George W. Bush from office. His goal was to help turn out a record number of young voters and others who had never voted before. What follows is often surprising, funny, enlightening and frightening.
To stream, download, or burn a DVD of "Slacker Uprising" free of charge, visit here: www.slackeruprising.com.
[source: www.michaelmoore.com]
Monday, October 13, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
9/11 & Government Bureaucracy by Ray Nowosielski
Another October is upon us once again. Crisp winds are begining to blow, the leaves are commencing their seasonal showing of spectral radiance, and another 9/11 anniversary has come and gone, begging us to remember that repressive legislation and worldwide carnage are the only things that stand between us and an Al-Qaeda victory party.
Fortunately for us, we are in an election year, so the nationalistic hyperbole was able to ring extra loud and hollow. Speakers at both the Democratic and Republican National Conventions attempted to drive home the notion that they and they alone could shield us from an otherwise certain death at the wrinkled hands of Osama Bin Laden.
Though politicians would love you to believe that expensive wars in far off lands can wipe out terrorism, unfortunately, it must be said that tactics and concepts are impervious to bullets and bombs. (Civilians who happen to be standing nearby to persons who might make use of such tactics or hold such ideas, are not however.) Likewise, it should be mentioned that laws giving more power to government and law enforcement, while stripping the dearly held rights of the citizenry, are also not the key to preventing the actions of a few determined souls.
In fact, I would argue that the US government had all of the power, money, and resources it needed to prevent 9/11, on 9/11. As evidence for this claim, I submit the fact that the CIA was monitoring future 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi, Khalid al-Midar, and Mohammed Atta for more than a year prior to the attacks. Not only were these would-be terrorists monitored, but the CIA was in posession of a copy Khalid al-Midar’s passport which included a multiple entry visa to the United States as far back as January 2000. Despite these facts, the FBI wasn’t warned about these characters until a few weeks before the attacks, and their names were never placed on terrorist watch lists.
All of this information comes straight from the Congressional “9/11 Report.” Mind you, most of it was buried in the footnotes. Perhaps you’re the type of person who would like to give the government the benefit of the doubt. Who wouldn’t? Consider then, that not only was the CIA aware of the movements of these Al-Qaeda terrorits, they were also aware of their associations to the embassy bombings in 1998 and the WTC bombing in 1993. On top of that, the CIA was monitoring a phone in Yemen which Nawaf al-Hazmi called from within the United States on several occasions using a phone that he had registered in his own name. Are we to believe that the big bad CIA couldn’t tell that these calls came from the U.S., thus demonstrating that Al-Qaeda was on our own soil?
Even after hijacker Khalid al-Midhar left the U.S. to assist with the bombing of the USS Cole in the port of Aden, the CIA refused to inform theFBI that terrorists were now operating out of our country. Of course, giant bureaucracies make mistakes, what with the magnitude of their work load, right? How then, are we supposed to make sense of internal cables being distributed within the CIA claiming the the FBI had been informed that these men were in the country, when in fact the FBI had not received one word that Al-Qaeda terrorists were within their jurisdiction?
How are we supposed to make sense of the fact that when an FBI agent tasked to the CIA tried to send on word of al-Hazmi’s and al-Midhar’s visas to enter the U.S., he was told by a CIA desk officer that, “This isn’t a matter for the FBI.”
Apparently, the CIA had everything they needed to locate terrorists, they only lacked the will to disrupt their plots. Though they weren’t up to sharing information with the FBI, they were very much inclined to make the President believe they had done so. On August 6th, 2001, when President Bush received his now famous PDB (Presidential Daily Briefing) entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike Within the US,” the FBI was given an advance copy to look over and approve. After they had done so, someone then inserted descriptions of over 70 active FBI field investigations into the terrorist threat. This doctored version would be the one that President Bush would see, thus giving the perpetually vacationing executive the notion that domestic law enforcement was alerted to and responding to the Al-Qaeda issue, though of course, they were not.
Over the course of this entire year, our filmmaking team has been seeking funding for a documentary about the preceding story, with no success. We think it's an important and intriguing tale that needs to be further explored. "A true-life espionage mystery thriller about a cat-and-mouse game between the CIA and FBI played over the fate of two future September 11th hijackers."
"9/11 is old news," we are told again and again. You can find this entire story for yourself in the 9/11 Commission Report and the FBI Inspector General's Report, provided that you know what to look for. However, thanks to a mainstream media that has not adequately educated us on the important issues involved here, most people who have read the report have not known what to look for or understood the ramifications of what the Commissioners have reported. Hopefully it won’t take too many more disasterous wars and a much further slide into bankruptcy for the public to wisen up, or next October might be a lot more bleak and dreary.
- by Ray Nowosielski, Director, 9/11 Press For Truth (Ironweed Films Volume 34: September 2008) For more information, visit http://www.ironweedfilms.com/films/past
Fortunately for us, we are in an election year, so the nationalistic hyperbole was able to ring extra loud and hollow. Speakers at both the Democratic and Republican National Conventions attempted to drive home the notion that they and they alone could shield us from an otherwise certain death at the wrinkled hands of Osama Bin Laden.
Though politicians would love you to believe that expensive wars in far off lands can wipe out terrorism, unfortunately, it must be said that tactics and concepts are impervious to bullets and bombs. (Civilians who happen to be standing nearby to persons who might make use of such tactics or hold such ideas, are not however.) Likewise, it should be mentioned that laws giving more power to government and law enforcement, while stripping the dearly held rights of the citizenry, are also not the key to preventing the actions of a few determined souls.
In fact, I would argue that the US government had all of the power, money, and resources it needed to prevent 9/11, on 9/11. As evidence for this claim, I submit the fact that the CIA was monitoring future 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi, Khalid al-Midar, and Mohammed Atta for more than a year prior to the attacks. Not only were these would-be terrorists monitored, but the CIA was in posession of a copy Khalid al-Midar’s passport which included a multiple entry visa to the United States as far back as January 2000. Despite these facts, the FBI wasn’t warned about these characters until a few weeks before the attacks, and their names were never placed on terrorist watch lists.
All of this information comes straight from the Congressional “9/11 Report.” Mind you, most of it was buried in the footnotes. Perhaps you’re the type of person who would like to give the government the benefit of the doubt. Who wouldn’t? Consider then, that not only was the CIA aware of the movements of these Al-Qaeda terrorits, they were also aware of their associations to the embassy bombings in 1998 and the WTC bombing in 1993. On top of that, the CIA was monitoring a phone in Yemen which Nawaf al-Hazmi called from within the United States on several occasions using a phone that he had registered in his own name. Are we to believe that the big bad CIA couldn’t tell that these calls came from the U.S., thus demonstrating that Al-Qaeda was on our own soil?
Even after hijacker Khalid al-Midhar left the U.S. to assist with the bombing of the USS Cole in the port of Aden, the CIA refused to inform theFBI that terrorists were now operating out of our country. Of course, giant bureaucracies make mistakes, what with the magnitude of their work load, right? How then, are we supposed to make sense of internal cables being distributed within the CIA claiming the the FBI had been informed that these men were in the country, when in fact the FBI had not received one word that Al-Qaeda terrorists were within their jurisdiction?
How are we supposed to make sense of the fact that when an FBI agent tasked to the CIA tried to send on word of al-Hazmi’s and al-Midhar’s visas to enter the U.S., he was told by a CIA desk officer that, “This isn’t a matter for the FBI.”
Apparently, the CIA had everything they needed to locate terrorists, they only lacked the will to disrupt their plots. Though they weren’t up to sharing information with the FBI, they were very much inclined to make the President believe they had done so. On August 6th, 2001, when President Bush received his now famous PDB (Presidential Daily Briefing) entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike Within the US,” the FBI was given an advance copy to look over and approve. After they had done so, someone then inserted descriptions of over 70 active FBI field investigations into the terrorist threat. This doctored version would be the one that President Bush would see, thus giving the perpetually vacationing executive the notion that domestic law enforcement was alerted to and responding to the Al-Qaeda issue, though of course, they were not.
Over the course of this entire year, our filmmaking team has been seeking funding for a documentary about the preceding story, with no success. We think it's an important and intriguing tale that needs to be further explored. "A true-life espionage mystery thriller about a cat-and-mouse game between the CIA and FBI played over the fate of two future September 11th hijackers."
"9/11 is old news," we are told again and again. You can find this entire story for yourself in the 9/11 Commission Report and the FBI Inspector General's Report, provided that you know what to look for. However, thanks to a mainstream media that has not adequately educated us on the important issues involved here, most people who have read the report have not known what to look for or understood the ramifications of what the Commissioners have reported. Hopefully it won’t take too many more disasterous wars and a much further slide into bankruptcy for the public to wisen up, or next October might be a lot more bleak and dreary.
- by Ray Nowosielski, Director, 9/11 Press For Truth (Ironweed Films Volume 34: September 2008) For more information, visit http://www.ironweedfilms.com/films/past
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
